What is Communism
What is Communism?
I once naively thought that communism was just another expression of Marxism.
But later, as my knowledge grew—especially after reading some of Professor Qin Hui’s articles—I realized I was wrong. I had completely misunderstood it. To put it simply, communism is merely a distortion of the class and revolution aspects of Marxist theory, or rather, Marx’s theories were only a spark for communism, nothing more.
I also used to believe that communism was the fanatical, cult-like fundamentalism of Lenin, Stalin, or Mao. But upon closer reflection, Khrushchev denounced Stalin, and Deng Xiaoping betrayed Mao, yet both continued to wave the banner of communism high. So, I realized I was wrong again.
Now I understand: communism is a chameleon-like ideology, driven entirely by the pursuit and control of power—a utopian trap.
To put it more vividly, communists first plant a grand flag in the void and declare themselves its standard-bearers. The flag’s location? The standard-bearer decides. The path to follow? The standard-bearer decides. How long it takes to get there? The standard-bearer decides. Worse still, those who don’t follow the standard-bearer—or can’t even see the flag—are labeled as backward, enemies, or at the very least, potential enemies. And when dealing with its enemies, communism reverts to its chameleon nature, forming a “perfect” closed loop.
The problem lies precisely in this “perfection.” Think about it: for communists, the heavens may be cloudy or clear, the earth may be flawed, and humans are but specks of dust. Yet communism alone is deemed “perfect.” Does it need a moral底线?
Why bother with a底线? To add a footnote to “perfection”? If it needs a footnote, can it still be called “perfect”?
So, communism has no底线. To be more precise, any communism with a底线 is merely a disguise—and disguise is a key trait of the chameleon, isn’t it?
Communism is a hybrid of biological evolutionism and utopian socialism—a mixture of dog shit and venomous poison.
I once naively thought that communism was just another expression of Marxism.
But later, as my knowledge grew—especially after reading some of Professor Qin Hui’s articles—I realized I was wrong. I had completely misunderstood it. To put it simply, communism is merely a distortion of the class and revolution aspects of Marxist theory, or rather, Marx’s theories were only a spark for communism, nothing more.
I also used to believe that communism was the fanatical, cult-like fundamentalism of Lenin, Stalin, or Mao. But upon closer reflection, Khrushchev denounced Stalin, and Deng Xiaoping betrayed Mao, yet both continued to wave the banner of communism high. So, I realized I was wrong again.
Now I understand: communism is a chameleon-like ideology, driven entirely by the pursuit and control of power—a utopian trap.
To put it more vividly, communists first plant a grand flag in the void and declare themselves its standard-bearers. The flag’s location? The standard-bearer decides. The path to follow? The standard-bearer decides. How long it takes to get there? The standard-bearer decides. Worse still, those who don’t follow the standard-bearer—or can’t even see the flag—are labeled as backward, enemies, or at the very least, potential enemies. And when dealing with its enemies, communism reverts to its chameleon nature, forming a “perfect” closed loop.
The problem lies precisely in this “perfection.” Think about it: for communists, the heavens may be cloudy or clear, the earth may be flawed, and humans are but specks of dust. Yet communism alone is deemed “perfect.” Does it need a moral底线?
Why bother with a底线? To add a footnote to “perfection”? If it needs a footnote, can it still be called “perfect”?
So, communism has no底线. To be more precise, any communism with a底线 is merely a disguise—and disguise is a key trait of the chameleon, isn’t it?
Communism is a hybrid of biological evolutionism and utopian socialism—a mixture of dog shit and venomous poison.
