六四和反送中粉红抹黑术语，你知道哪些？
之所以说这个，是因为今天我身边的粉红（曾经的好友）发给我一些抹黑六四学运和香港反送中的不实言论。
六四中是否有攻击士兵的学生呢，肯定是有的。但是是士兵先屠杀平民还是学生先攻击士兵呢？粉红认为平民攻击士兵，士兵出于自卫才反击的。学生领袖是否有人成功逃走出国呢？这个也应该有，但是并不是卷款出国，简直可笑之极。如果你好不容易逃离六四屠杀又要被清算了你会不会逃走呢？
然后再有说国外媒体选择性报道香港示威者，不报道示威者杀反对他们的人。这个明显更是无中生有。
以下是粉红（既得利益者）的原话:
I have watched lots of videos about 1989 n Hongkong protests on YouTube. In 4th June, the protesters caught some soldiers n beat them to death, one soldiers was even tied up n set on fire, burned alive to death. This was the reason the armored force was sent to clear up the Tiananmen square. This was showed on TV then. But none of the videos on YouTube mentioned it. So the protestors seemed totally innocent, seeking for justice.
Almost all the Videos about Hong Kong protests just tell what the police have done to the protestors, pepper spray, tear gas. Very few show what the protestors have done to the police, to the community, to the people who don't agree with them. So they seem like fighters for freedom, representative of. Justice.
It is not objective n unreasonable to say one party is absolutely wrong regardless of whatever the other party has done.
Of course CCP has made mistakes, who can deny that? But can it be the reason for u to deny our country, to abandon ur identity as a Chinese.
六四中是否有攻击士兵的学生呢，肯定是有的。但是是士兵先屠杀平民还是学生先攻击士兵呢？粉红认为平民攻击士兵，士兵出于自卫才反击的。学生领袖是否有人成功逃走出国呢？这个也应该有，但是并不是卷款出国，简直可笑之极。如果你好不容易逃离六四屠杀又要被清算了你会不会逃走呢？
然后再有说国外媒体选择性报道香港示威者，不报道示威者杀反对他们的人。这个明显更是无中生有。
以下是粉红（既得利益者）的原话:
I have watched lots of videos about 1989 n Hongkong protests on YouTube. In 4th June, the protesters caught some soldiers n beat them to death, one soldiers was even tied up n set on fire, burned alive to death. This was the reason the armored force was sent to clear up the Tiananmen square. This was showed on TV then. But none of the videos on YouTube mentioned it. So the protestors seemed totally innocent, seeking for justice.
Almost all the Videos about Hong Kong protests just tell what the police have done to the protestors, pepper spray, tear gas. Very few show what the protestors have done to the police, to the community, to the people who don't agree with them. So they seem like fighters for freedom, representative of. Justice.
It is not objective n unreasonable to say one party is absolutely wrong regardless of whatever the other party has done.
Of course CCP has made mistakes, who can deny that? But can it be the reason for u to deny our country, to abandon ur identity as a Chinese.
根据人民日报记载，最初开枪是6月3日深夜，军博附近（木樨地）。
根据“共和国卫士”名单，戒严部队最初的死者（刘国庚），死亡地点是六部口。
无论从时间还是地点上，谁先攻击谁一目了然。都是中共官方记录，也甭想甩锅“西方媒体造谣”之类。
对于揪住香港示威黑点不放的，一句话：“脱离剂量谈毒性都是耍流氓”。
根据“共和国卫士”名单，戒严部队最初的死者（刘国庚），死亡地点是六部口。
无论从时间还是地点上，谁先攻击谁一目了然。都是中共官方记录，也甭想甩锅“西方媒体造谣”之类。
对于揪住香港示威黑点不放的，一句话：“脱离剂量谈毒性都是耍流氓”。
针对香港示威一事，不少人放大了示威者暴力行为，但是只追究示威者，丝毫不提为什么合理非的抗争会变成暴力，这种手法就是放大一部分对自己有利的，然后疯狂批评，剩下的就丝毫不在乎了！
至于64，有承认的，有不承认的，但是肯定有许多人觉得军队是保持了克制！！！（为什么呢！因为新闻联播就是这么说的）然后最最最让人恶心的是赞成杀多少多少人保这个政权多少年平安！对于这种人，我惊讶于非是统治阶级，反而以为自己和统治阶级在一条床上，哪知道，你可能是被专政的对象而已！
至于64，有承认的，有不承认的，但是肯定有许多人觉得军队是保持了克制！！！（为什么呢！因为新闻联播就是这么说的）然后最最最让人恶心的是赞成杀多少多少人保这个政权多少年平安！对于这种人，我惊讶于非是统治阶级，反而以为自己和统治阶级在一条床上，哪知道，你可能是被专政的对象而已！
既得利益者得了便宜还卖乖的小粉红，自干五不得好死