【待证实】如何看待已经存在的证据集合, 病毒从武汉实验室流出基本可以确定？

https://project-evidence.github.io/

一周前匿名发布, 目前第7.6版.
里面有许多很有意思的潜在证据.

注意： 该文没有确切结论. 只是合理怀疑
1. 病毒早先在实验室中（文章不关心是否人造/天然, 是否故意放毒）
2. 病毒经过人或动物, 开始大面积传播

搬运一下结论部分：

Up until this point, we have been presenting each of our claims in a vacuum. Let us put them together:

At some point in late 2019, many people who visited the The Huanan Seafood Marketfell ill due to a new disease. To date the origin of this disease is unknown.


This market is less than 9 miles away from The Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, which:

• Developed chimeric SARS-like coronaviruses
• Conducted ’dangerous’ gain-of-function research on the SARS-CoV-1 virus
• Established a 96.2% match with SARS-CoV-2 and a virus they sampled from a cave over 1,000 miles away from Wuhan
• Injected live piglets with bat coronaviruses as recently as July 2019: Paper 5, Paper 7, Paper 8
• Tested its disinfecting procedures with a bat coronavirus
• Published a paper on a close descendant of SARS-CoV-1, MERS-CoV, in November 2019
• Was hiring researchers to work on bat coronaviruses as recently as November 2019
• The United States State Department claimed had ’inadequate safety’
• Deleted a press release detailing a U.S. State Department visit
• Has not provided concrete evidence that one of their prior researchers is still alive, despite rumors on Chinese social media that they are "Patient Zero", despite one of their other top researchers coming out and swearing the virus had nothing to do with her lab
• Had a researcher accuse the director of the Institute of selling infected lab animals to vendors on Weibo (with pictures of herself and her employee ID included); afterwards, she claimed she was ’hacked’
• Had staff trained by a Chinese-Canadian scientist at Canada’s only BSL-4 lab who has now been under RCMP investigation for nearly a year following a shipment of Ebola and Henipahvirus from that lab to a lab in China

The market is also less than 3 miles away from the Wuhan Centre for Disease Control, which:

• Was actually already accused of being the source of the outbreak from a now-withdrawn academic paper from a notable Chinese scholar at the South China University of China
• Once kept horseshoe bats, a known reservoir of SARS-CoV-1, within its labs
• Once performed surgery on live animals within its labs
• Had a researcher who quarantined on two separate occasions; once upon coming into contact with bat blood after being ’attacked’ and another time when he was urinated upon in a cave while wearing inadequate personal protection

Let us also look at the actions of China before and after the outbreak, which:

• Had the SARS-CoV-1 virus escape from a lab in Beijing, twice
• Compensated families after 27 students were infected with Brucella bacteria during an anatomy course in 2011
• Is currently investigating a similar Brucella outbreak amongst "over 100 Students and Staff" in December 2019
• Issued bio-safety guidelines to ’fix chronic management loopholes at virus labs’
• Arrested a ’top academician’ for illegally selling lab animals and ’experimental milk’ in January 2020
• Censored local medical professionals who attempted to report the outbreak
• Ordered local labs to destroy any samples of the new virus
• Withheld the virus’s genome nearly a week after they sequenced it
• Continually insisted on no human-to-human transmission
• Launched the largest national quarantine in human history once containment failed
• Allowed a Party spokesperson to accuse the United States Army of intentionally bringing SARS-CoV-2 to Wuhan

Also in January 2020, the United States Department of Justice arrested two Chinese nationals and the Chair of the "Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Harvard University" for allegedly receiving illegal payments from China, "acting as an agent of a foreign government," and "attempting to smuggle 21 vials of biological research to China."

Back to the market: the The Huanan Seafood Market didn’t even have bats for sale, and most bats species in Wuhan would be hibernating at the time of outbreak. It was reported that 34% of cases had no contact with the market, and ’No epidemiological link was found between the first patient and later cases’.

If an infected animal was indeed the culprit, why did it fail to infect a single person outside of the market? It could not have been infected at the market, because there were no bats that could serve as sources of infection. So, where were all the infected people outside of Wuhan by the time SARS-CoV-2 started spreading in the market?

We hope that this document adequately addressed each claim with what evidence is available and fulfilled its secondary responsibility of educating you on biolaboratory safety. By now, we hope you understand that these claims are not impossible; they are in fact more than likely.

We may never be certain of the truth. What we are certain of, however, is that these claims shouldn’t be discounted, and far more research must be done to disprove either one.

Our work as a global community must continue.