李顯龍這貨又在舔共，他感覺很真心，到底在想什麼？

昨天的採訪 摘錄兩段有代表性的 我會在下面翻譯

I think the other significant thing, which depends on attitudes of the countries in the world, is Taiwan. Because One China is the basis on which nearly every country in the world recognises the PRC, and has informal, unofficial relations with Taiwan. And I think that has to remain the fundamental basis on which the relationships are maintained and the status quo is justified. If we start thinking of Taiwan as an analogue of Ukraine — a member of the United Nations, which is Ukraine — an independent sovereign country and one which therefore deserves to be defended because it is on the good side and the others are on the wrong side — China is on the wrong side — I think you are changing a very fundamental basis of the international understanding, and it will have very dangerous consequences. And if countries can make that very clear, I think that is helpful. Sometimes it is not so clear, and especially with a new generation and with the media, it becomes not a question of One China, but a question of democracy versus autocracy. And I think going that way is dangerous.

台灣和烏克蘭不同 全世界都承認一個中國 台灣不是主權國家 不能認為如果中國侵略台灣台灣應受捍衛，因為他是正確的一方而中國是錯誤的一方

更不該把一個中國問題看成獨裁和民主間的問題，這很危險

We all know what election seasons are like. You have to say all sorts of things to get elected in a hot contest. You try to say things you will not regret later. But sometimes these things happen, and you have to try and minimise the consequences of that. And at the same time, you have got to show goodwill and understanding of how things appear to the other side, to countries which find that the world has changed, that what used to be a small economy is now not so small, and maybe even bigger than you.

And therefore, it is not going to be so easy to accommodate (China) into the global system, and therefore (China) has to make its own concessions, its own accommodations, so that it is possible for a very difficult transition to take place peacefully. And that is something which I think intellectually Chinese leaders understand; in practice making it happen and making it be appreciated and understood — that is a big challenge

我們都知道選舉你要說很多違心之論，事後再來彌補（意味打壓中國支持台灣言論是基於美國選舉考量）要接受一個小經濟體變很大甚至比你大不容易，美國應該要學習包容


不要再說李顯龍是生意人了

我覺得他就是中華膠

以利益而言捍衛台灣不該是全球共同利益？

你講那個全世界都承認一中 不該類比烏克蘭 不該認為台灣被侵略就是正確的一方中國就是錯誤的一方

對於穩定國際局勢有什麼幫助？

然後你把中美對你說成美國選舉語言

完全不提中國不合理的補貼 瓢竊智慧財產和領土野心


我只想說

李顯龍你他媽這個人渣