为什么简体汉字圈能对美帝最高法9:0的判决还能指指点点？哪来的自信呢？
关于老川的
在葱共中央这，老川肯定不受待见
葱源于台湾，但台湾都很左的皮毛了
一个老右派很难在这个平台上被待见
也是应有之义，意料之中
这没什么奇怪的
奇怪的是这种人
已经在美国学习当地法律的葱央委员
用一本正经的瞎扯淡
来怼一个美帝最高法9:0的判案
振振有词，中英夹杂
你要是真不明白美帝的
说不定真被她给唬住了
问题是她说的东西呢
噪点多的都已经看不到画面了
你甚至都不知道从哪开始
怎样的一个教育经历才能怼出来
这样一个混乱的认知
如果美国法律教育界都是这种白痴产品
还自我感觉良好
那我就真替吾皇高兴
你真可能赢了
在葱共中央这，老川肯定不受待见
葱源于台湾，但台湾都很左的皮毛了
一个老右派很难在这个平台上被待见
也是应有之义，意料之中
这没什么奇怪的
奇怪的是这种人
已经在美国学习当地法律的葱央委员
用一本正经的瞎扯淡
来怼一个美帝最高法9:0的判案
振振有词，中英夹杂
你要是真不明白美帝的
说不定真被她给唬住了
问题是她说的东西呢
噪点多的都已经看不到画面了
你甚至都不知道从哪开始
怎样的一个教育经历才能怼出来
这样一个混乱的认知
如果美国法律教育界都是这种白痴产品
还自我感觉良好
那我就真替吾皇高兴
你真可能赢了
这很奇怪吗？打开媒体，你可能觉得墙内是美国的一部分，天天是美国新闻，这个不好那里不好。
人们对美国政治津津乐道章口就来，你别管是不是有道理，但这了如指掌如数家珍的架势，那是让正儿八经美国人都觉得目瞪口呆，真是比美国人还美国人。但你问他你们这片人大代表是谁，有什么提议，干了什么事儿，哪能找到他，甚至社区主任是谁，就傻逼了。
他们思维比较鸵鸟，伟大领袖没有丑闻见报那就是完人。至于为什么没见报，你和他深究他讲不过你就话锋一转，这事儿可不兴说啊~这时候你要是觉得他前面都是演的，你就傻逼了，因为他是真傻逼，只有最后这段是演的，让你赶紧别说了，他还要做梦呢。
另外葱里也是的啊，对国外西方国家政策指指点点，什么白左，什么垃圾，人家反堕胎搞环保低碳，你们这些支猪怎么配来指摘，好好学习和别人看齐吧。
人们对美国政治津津乐道章口就来，你别管是不是有道理，但这了如指掌如数家珍的架势，那是让正儿八经美国人都觉得目瞪口呆，真是比美国人还美国人。但你问他你们这片人大代表是谁，有什么提议，干了什么事儿，哪能找到他，甚至社区主任是谁，就傻逼了。
他们思维比较鸵鸟，伟大领袖没有丑闻见报那就是完人。至于为什么没见报，你和他深究他讲不过你就话锋一转，这事儿可不兴说啊~这时候你要是觉得他前面都是演的，你就傻逼了，因为他是真傻逼，只有最后这段是演的，让你赶紧别说了，他还要做梦呢。
另外葱里也是的啊，对国外西方国家政策指指点点，什么白左，什么垃圾，人家反堕胎搞环保低碳，你们这些支猪怎么配来指摘，好好学习和别人看齐吧。
Trump到底對你蔥人幹了什麼壞事每天被追殺
他要當的是美國總統又不是你蔥總統
美國人要不支持他就不會選他上去
全球民主自由左逼大聯盟了屬於是
他要當的是美國總統又不是你蔥總統
美國人要不支持他就不會選他上去
全球民主自由左逼大聯盟了屬於是
第8964次论证支黑的重要性
支黑完全不会在意任何间中圈的论调
支黑完全不会在意任何间中圈的论调
行啊，你既然歧视用简体中文来怼高院判决，那我给你转个热门法律专业网站的英文原地开骂的文章，但是问题……你看得懂吗？这可是aba journal评选的最受律师欢迎有律师撰写的网站之一。
https://abovethelaw.com/2024/03/scotus-keeps-trump-on-the-co-ballot-because-eh-whatever-its-all-vibes/
Have there ever been nine people on earth more convinced of their own pious righteousness? After Mitch McConnell stole the Gorsuch seat and shoehorned in Barrett so that SCOTUS could blow up Roe, these assholes still think that they’re a stabilizing force holding together American society. If only we just BELIEVE that the nation’s highest Court is a force for good, then we can make it through this together!
And so in this spirit the Court issued a per curiam order this morning ruling that Donald Trump cannot be disqualified from the ballot.
It was clear after oral argument that the justices were never going to let states boot Trump under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Sure, okay, the plain language of the Constitution says that “no person shall” hold office in federal or state government after engaging in “insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.” But, see, if you squint real close, it also says — in invisible ink! — that this section only applies if Congress passes implementing legislation, so states shouldn’t get any bright ideas about keeping insurrectionists off the ballot.
TL, DR?
They took the “not self-executing” off ramp, and congratulated themselves for their Solomonic wisdom. (Presumably after a good hearty laugh at the months of professorial onanism over the definitions of “officer” and “oath.”)
“[I]f States were free to enforce Section 3 by barring candidates from running in the first place, Congress would be forced to exercise its disability removal power before voting begins if it wished for its decision to have any effect on the current election cycle,” the five male justices declaim, as if Congress hadn’t refused to seat many former Confederates elected to office by the states. That is right and proper, see, but a state barring insurrectionists from running for federal office on its own ballot is a grievous assault on democracy.
Have there ever been nine people on earth more convinced of their own pious righteousness? After Mitch McConnell stole the Gorsuch seat and shoehorned in Barrett so that SCOTUS could blow up Roe, these assholes still think that they’re a stabilizing force holding together American society. If only we just BELIEVE that the nation’s highest Court is a force for good, then we can make it through this together!
And so in this spirit the Court issued a per curiam order this morning ruling that Donald Trump cannot be disqualified from the ballot.
It was clear after oral argument that the justices were never going to let states boot Trump under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Sure, okay, the plain language of the Constitution says that “no person shall” hold office in federal or state government after engaging in “insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.” But, see, if you squint real close, it also says — in invisible ink! — that this section only applies if Congress passes implementing legislation, so states shouldn’t get any bright ideas about keeping insurrectionists off the ballot.
TL, DR?
They took the “not self-executing” off ramp, and congratulated themselves for their Solomonic wisdom. (Presumably after a good hearty laugh at the months of professorial onanism over the definitions of “officer” and “oath.”)
“[I]f States were free to enforce Section 3 by barring candidates from running in the first place, Congress would be forced to exercise its disability removal power before voting begins if it wished for its decision to have any effect on the current election cycle,” the five male justices declaim, as if Congress hadn’t refused to seat many former Confederates elected to office by the states. That is right and proper, see, but a state barring insurrectionists from running for federal office on its own ballot is a grievous assault on democracy.
你可别忘了，当年推翻了Roe以后，政界对高院不满的程度已经到了新闻都在大肆报道Biden可能要Pack the Court了！
当然，你可可能连啥是pack the court和他的历史及意义都不懂。
oh对了，以及我指指点点的底气就是我每年交税还是最高的税率，我想喷高院判决是我受1st AMD保护的权利。高院白宫国会没有人能因为我的不满而抓我，怎么，你想替他们抓一下？
https://abovethelaw.com/2024/03/scotus-keeps-trump-on-the-co-ballot-because-eh-whatever-its-all-vibes/
Have there ever been nine people on earth more convinced of their own pious righteousness? After Mitch McConnell stole the Gorsuch seat and shoehorned in Barrett so that SCOTUS could blow up Roe, these assholes still think that they’re a stabilizing force holding together American society. If only we just BELIEVE that the nation’s highest Court is a force for good, then we can make it through this together!
And so in this spirit the Court issued a per curiam order this morning ruling that Donald Trump cannot be disqualified from the ballot.
It was clear after oral argument that the justices were never going to let states boot Trump under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Sure, okay, the plain language of the Constitution says that “no person shall” hold office in federal or state government after engaging in “insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.” But, see, if you squint real close, it also says — in invisible ink! — that this section only applies if Congress passes implementing legislation, so states shouldn’t get any bright ideas about keeping insurrectionists off the ballot.
TL, DR?
They took the “not self-executing” off ramp, and congratulated themselves for their Solomonic wisdom. (Presumably after a good hearty laugh at the months of professorial onanism over the definitions of “officer” and “oath.”)
“[I]f States were free to enforce Section 3 by barring candidates from running in the first place, Congress would be forced to exercise its disability removal power before voting begins if it wished for its decision to have any effect on the current election cycle,” the five male justices declaim, as if Congress hadn’t refused to seat many former Confederates elected to office by the states. That is right and proper, see, but a state barring insurrectionists from running for federal office on its own ballot is a grievous assault on democracy.
Have there ever been nine people on earth more convinced of their own pious righteousness? After Mitch McConnell stole the Gorsuch seat and shoehorned in Barrett so that SCOTUS could blow up Roe, these assholes still think that they’re a stabilizing force holding together American society. If only we just BELIEVE that the nation’s highest Court is a force for good, then we can make it through this together!
And so in this spirit the Court issued a per curiam order this morning ruling that Donald Trump cannot be disqualified from the ballot.
It was clear after oral argument that the justices were never going to let states boot Trump under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Sure, okay, the plain language of the Constitution says that “no person shall” hold office in federal or state government after engaging in “insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.” But, see, if you squint real close, it also says — in invisible ink! — that this section only applies if Congress passes implementing legislation, so states shouldn’t get any bright ideas about keeping insurrectionists off the ballot.
TL, DR?
They took the “not self-executing” off ramp, and congratulated themselves for their Solomonic wisdom. (Presumably after a good hearty laugh at the months of professorial onanism over the definitions of “officer” and “oath.”)
“[I]f States were free to enforce Section 3 by barring candidates from running in the first place, Congress would be forced to exercise its disability removal power before voting begins if it wished for its decision to have any effect on the current election cycle,” the five male justices declaim, as if Congress hadn’t refused to seat many former Confederates elected to office by the states. That is right and proper, see, but a state barring insurrectionists from running for federal office on its own ballot is a grievous assault on democracy.
你可别忘了，当年推翻了Roe以后，政界对高院不满的程度已经到了新闻都在大肆报道Biden可能要Pack the Court了！
当然，你可可能连啥是pack the court和他的历史及意义都不懂。
oh对了，以及我指指点点的底气就是我每年交税还是最高的税率，我想喷高院判决是我受1st AMD保护的权利。高院白宫国会没有人能因为我的不满而抓我，怎么，你想替他们抓一下？
左派都是立场先行，屁股决定脑袋。一个从洼地爬升到正常社会没几年的，居然满满的对美国穷人的道德优越感。人家都直说了，支持川普的美国人都是活该被淘汰的，这时候左派嘴里大喊的「平等」就不见了。不过这也不奇怪，左派的一贯逻辑就是「所有人都是平等的，但是我们左派更平等」。
支那人一次票都沒投過但最愛對別國事務評頭論足
你說的是誰，我想看看
看了才更好思考一下才是
我终于找到了。我抱怨一下啊，您这位只会分左右不太行啊，
我是不能被分左右的，我比左还左，我比右还右，我没有偏向，我只有极端，我是极端水晶球，全方位无死角！
看了才更好思考一下才是
我终于找到了。我抱怨一下啊，您这位只会分左右不太行啊，
我是不能被分左右的，我比左还左，我比右还右，我没有偏向，我只有极端，我是极端水晶球，全方位无死角！
难道太监不能八卦皇帝和娘娘们的宫闱事？
有点光透进来被人看到怎么也不是件坏事。
有点光透进来被人看到怎么也不是件坏事。
这就表现出了专制的好处了呗，发一道圣旨直接把川普诛十族，不就可以扫除人类进步的障碍，向着人人平等的公有制社会大踏步迈进了吗。如此大快人心的事情，竟然被可恶的最高法否决了，不仅最高法否决了，竟然还有这么多反智的蠢货支持川普，反对多元社会，反对环保，我们如此费尽心机的教育你们拯救你们，你们竟然不领情还要反对我们，真是一群没有远见不相信科学的刁民！
美國法律臭屎散佈，幾個州的垃圾法官，可以利用一條一百前年的古董舊條例，試圖封殺川普參選
這次是運氣好，被最高法院擋下來了!川普保著了參選權
川普一身政治迫害的官司，告訴世人，司法獨立原來也可以是司法人員獨立迫害政敵的工具
這次是運氣好，被最高法院擋下來了!川普保著了參選權
川普一身政治迫害的官司，告訴世人，司法獨立原來也可以是司法人員獨立迫害政敵的工具
最近30年吃饱饭了，有俩糟钱儿了，马路上能看见洋人了，开了奥运了，有玩具航母了，我们特么能和美国平起平坐了！！
除了余茂春和章家敦，都一帮老鼠上桌的东西。
除了余茂春和章家敦，都一帮老鼠上桌的东西。
不太明白为啥用“简体汉字圈”作为指代。
我觉得美联邦法院9:0的裁决对美国意义重大，但我就用的简体汉字啊。而且，楼主用的不也是简体汉字吗？
我觉得美联邦法院9:0的裁决对美国意义重大，但我就用的简体汉字啊。而且，楼主用的不也是简体汉字吗？
大法官的判决又不是圣旨，怎么就不能评论了？
不会用事实和论据说话，总要拿一些东西当作至高无上不能质疑，这才是支性不改。
不会用事实和论据说话，总要拿一些东西当作至高无上不能质疑，这才是支性不改。
支國憲法幾乎都是完全抄襲前蘇聯和日本的
現在有模有樣去批判自由國度的法律條文
他也配
現在有模有樣去批判自由國度的法律條文
他也配
O5一1
灰名单
這裡一堆人親川,海外大陸人也是,估計台人也是
已隐藏
你跟一个我赚的钱多纳的税多我有理的斗啥呢，需要的时候就拿1st amd颐使气指，不需要的时候就支持拜登政府ban掉所谓的covid misinformation hate speech，宪法都给你们玩明白了
简体汉字圈能对美帝最高法9:0的判决还能指指点点，是因为他们以为东方文化才是正宗，所以他们这样做
互道傻逼吧
看了大状律师的辩驳
只能有这四个字
然后抽身一下，提出这个问题就是
为什么简体中文下的出生成长者
如果有机会能接触了西方文明皮毛后
天然倾向会成为左逼？
而不是相反？
得需要什么样的触发
才能让他们成为老保右？老保子？
看了大状律师的辩驳
只能有这四个字
然后抽身一下，提出这个问题就是
为什么简体中文下的出生成长者
如果有机会能接触了西方文明皮毛后
天然倾向会成为左逼？
而不是相反？
得需要什么样的触发
才能让他们成为老保右？老保子？