Quora上的一篇post
Despite the disappointment that his archetypal capacity for extracting useful knowledge from data fails us in a constant manner, Chairman Xi deserves in this aspect our empathy: until now the data, small or big, are rarely, if ever, unprocessed and independent of censorship.
Prong one: Building a moderately prosperous society inclusive of all
Do not cheat me on apartment rents! And I am far from the poorest, really. Some peasants literally make net profits of no more than 1,000 dollars per year despite drops of sweat and other costs. Thus, urban citizens should not blame on peasants for the skyrocketing prices for necessities and food.hey must seek non-agricultural jobs to bring bread and salt to the table! Digging potatoes out of muddy fields disheartens them and leaves no time for a break.
Prong two: Sustainable development and wealth inequality
Status quo or new paradigm? That is a question. One thing should be in particular pointed out: military-civilian integration strategy, a sign of courting his thingmen egregiously.
Prong three: Rural property rights
It is of ill etiquette to throw surpassing discontent in and out. Hong Kongers have five major demands, I concede it to only one: return my grandparents’ farm back!
Prong four: Deepening reform
I am just wondering if anyone has ever tried to objectively summarise the overall impacts in one comprehensive study in terms of shivering, sometimes wanton recalibration and reenactment of this reform yesterday, that improvement morning today, this deal tonight, that initiative tomorrow, and so on. Technically given that building up rationale for reform agenda is a non-trivial exercise, and is expensive in terms of resources, manpower and time to create and maintain them on an ongoing basis, there have to be compelling reasons to undertake such endeavour. I observe substantial regression. Ivy League of Cronyism, right? So why not do more of the same in prognosis of whole-range pandaemonium to give a light touch? Making great headlines — remember the killer line over the same period. A few thoughts.) China’s economy cannot endure such ham-handed practice if it is to reform.
Prong five: Governing the nation according to law
Rule of Law? No. Rule of Man? Are you joking? Man of Rule. Man rules man. Not governance, rule! That has gotten it right finally. An appalling détournement indeed.
Prong six: Tightening Party discipline
At last we arrived here! Only this makes a difference. Regardless of how those low-profile civil servants are bemoaning of or ridiculing privately at these copybooks.
原作者:Albert Werner Cheng (也是Le salon de la démocratie的创立者)
Prong one: Building a moderately prosperous society inclusive of all
Do not cheat me on apartment rents! And I am far from the poorest, really. Some peasants literally make net profits of no more than 1,000 dollars per year despite drops of sweat and other costs. Thus, urban citizens should not blame on peasants for the skyrocketing prices for necessities and food.hey must seek non-agricultural jobs to bring bread and salt to the table! Digging potatoes out of muddy fields disheartens them and leaves no time for a break.
Prong two: Sustainable development and wealth inequality
Status quo or new paradigm? That is a question. One thing should be in particular pointed out: military-civilian integration strategy, a sign of courting his thingmen egregiously.
Prong three: Rural property rights
It is of ill etiquette to throw surpassing discontent in and out. Hong Kongers have five major demands, I concede it to only one: return my grandparents’ farm back!
Prong four: Deepening reform
I am just wondering if anyone has ever tried to objectively summarise the overall impacts in one comprehensive study in terms of shivering, sometimes wanton recalibration and reenactment of this reform yesterday, that improvement morning today, this deal tonight, that initiative tomorrow, and so on. Technically given that building up rationale for reform agenda is a non-trivial exercise, and is expensive in terms of resources, manpower and time to create and maintain them on an ongoing basis, there have to be compelling reasons to undertake such endeavour. I observe substantial regression. Ivy League of Cronyism, right? So why not do more of the same in prognosis of whole-range pandaemonium to give a light touch? Making great headlines — remember the killer line over the same period. A few thoughts.) China’s economy cannot endure such ham-handed practice if it is to reform.
Prong five: Governing the nation according to law
Rule of Law? No. Rule of Man? Are you joking? Man of Rule. Man rules man. Not governance, rule! That has gotten it right finally. An appalling détournement indeed.
Prong six: Tightening Party discipline
At last we arrived here! Only this makes a difference. Regardless of how those low-profile civil servants are bemoaning of or ridiculing privately at these copybooks.
原作者:Albert Werner Cheng (也是Le salon de la démocratie的创立者)
7 个评论
农业问题无解,你不可能依靠农村这些被“改”的人,来觉醒并推翻中共
实际上,在庞大的维稳和城镇化的策略推行后,想推倒农村的压迫力量,就已经只能靠华人和外国人推翻中共后再逐步调整了,因为基数太大分布太广
实际上,在庞大的维稳和城镇化的策略推行后,想推倒农村的压迫力量,就已经只能靠华人和外国人推翻中共后再逐步调整了,因为基数太大分布太广
農民本身是一盤散沙,需要受過教育的中產階級去動員。
概念乱用,意识空虚,堆叠单词。
看了他credentials和self-description无数的ism和ist就知道是个典型的学了几个月etymology和morphology的支那左派学生。
零营养。
看了他credentials和self-description无数的ism和ist就知道是个典型的学了几个月etymology和morphology的支那左派学生。
零营养。
光看小标题,看到deepen reform,我忍不住笑了,难道是用机器翻译的?
我看原作者一点儿也不左派,看他的一些回答是很右倾的。
那你以后最好还是挑好的转载,这篇文章估计他是翻遍了自己的词典才堆出这么多,跟喝了酒一样说车轱辘话、词汇重复,还有些语法错误。非常像我以前教过的大学生,堆砌长句复杂句,最后叠出来的缝合怪跟狗屎一样。
Quora需要的是直达主旨、干练的答案。
Quora需要的是直达主旨、干练的答案。