如何看待美国佛罗里达去年通过的禁止在学校场合批评犹太人的法律？
油管上看到的一个疑似高级五毛的评论，起因是我看到他在一个大外宣（Barret）的节目下面批评美国政府不遵守宪法，随意出台法律违宪。然后就搬出了这样一个事例（确实有查到新闻，但非常奇怪的是所有中文媒体都没有相关报道），同时还有说宪法禁止资助宗教团体，然而美国却给了犹太复国主义者300亿美金（没查到数据）。请问各位，以上是否属实。真的如他所说，违宪吗？谢谢！
原文如下"
"Yes. This year a law was passed making it illegal to criticise Israel. To do so can carry a 20 year jail term, or fine and loss of job. Several high profile academics have lost their already for criticism of Israel. This law was passed at the behest of a foreign power an is a violation of the constitution The constitution Says America must not provide financial support to religious organisations, yet it gives 30 billion dollars of tax payers money to the Zionist state of Israel. You must be naive if think that America is abiding by the constitution. Apart from the constitution America is breaking international law on a daily basis. Why don’t you look these things up yourself??
相关新闻：
https://www.jta.org/quick-reads/broward-county-florida-commission-passes-anti-israel-boycott-resolution
原文如下"
"Yes. This year a law was passed making it illegal to criticise Israel. To do so can carry a 20 year jail term, or fine and loss of job. Several high profile academics have lost their already for criticism of Israel. This law was passed at the behest of a foreign power an is a violation of the constitution The constitution Says America must not provide financial support to religious organisations, yet it gives 30 billion dollars of tax payers money to the Zionist state of Israel. You must be naive if think that America is abiding by the constitution. Apart from the constitution America is breaking international law on a daily basis. Why don’t you look these things up yourself??
相关新闻：
https://www.jta.org/quick-reads/broward-county-florida-commission-passes-anti-israel-boycott-resolution
犹太复国主义者为何是宗教团体呢？以色列明明是世俗国家，犹太教正统派反而反对犹太复国吧。
https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2019/741/BillText/Filed/PDF
法律原文。这条法律原文明确规定了其内容不影响受第一修正案保护的言论自由
这么看的话，这条法律基本上是一条没用的法律。因为hate crime（如：发推特号召下周二在迈阿密发起杀光犹太人行动）本来就不受第一修正案保护。而单纯的发表个人观点（如：犹太人是劣等人种）一直就受第一修正案保护。所以这条法律似乎并不能创造一个罪名，把本来不是犯罪的行为认定为犯罪。
美国立法的量是非常大的。大多数州的法典长度都比欧洲大陆所有国家的法典总和还长。所以自从通过以后从来没有在实践中被引用过的法条数量也是相当惊人的。这条应该也会是其中之一。
法律原文。这条法律原文明确规定了其内容不影响受第一修正案保护的言论自由
This section does not diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States or the State Constitution.
这么看的话，这条法律基本上是一条没用的法律。因为hate crime（如：发推特号召下周二在迈阿密发起杀光犹太人行动）本来就不受第一修正案保护。而单纯的发表个人观点（如：犹太人是劣等人种）一直就受第一修正案保护。所以这条法律似乎并不能创造一个罪名，把本来不是犯罪的行为认定为犯罪。
美国立法的量是非常大的。大多数州的法典长度都比欧洲大陆所有国家的法典总和还长。所以自从通过以后从来没有在实践中被引用过的法条数量也是相当惊人的。这条应该也会是其中之一。
咸鱼之体
灰名单
你去观察一下持有反犹主义人其他的言论，看他们的立场是不是更接近集权?